{"id":526,"date":"2021-07-16T19:04:19","date_gmt":"2021-07-16T19:04:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/?page_id=526"},"modified":"2021-07-16T19:04:19","modified_gmt":"2021-07-16T19:04:19","slug":"mars-and-venus-surprised-by-vulcan-2","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/mars-and-venus-surprised-by-vulcan-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Mars and Venus Surprised by Vulcan"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-group alignfull\"><div class=\"wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-flow wp-block-group-is-layout-flow\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text alignwide is-stacked-on-mobile is-vertically-aligned-top tw-stack-md\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><a href=\"https:\/\/museumcollections.middlebury.edu\/objects\/3745\/mars-and-venus-surprised-by-vulcan?ctx=b9f7594b29e66e0587349eaa101b53e2287414de&amp;idx=2\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"733\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Mars-and-Venus-Surprised-by-Vulcan-733x1024.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-241 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Mars-and-Venus-Surprised-by-Vulcan-733x1024.jpeg 733w, https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Mars-and-Venus-Surprised-by-Vulcan-215x300.jpeg 215w, https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Mars-and-Venus-Surprised-by-Vulcan-768x1073.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Mars-and-Venus-Surprised-by-Vulcan.jpeg 1066w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 733px) 100vw, 733px\" \/><\/a><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">ARTIST: Hendrick Goltzius (Dutch, 1558 \u2013 1617)<br>DATE: 1585<br>TECHNIQUE: <a href=\"https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/engraving\/\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/engraving\/\">Engraving<\/a><br>DIMENSIONS: Image: 41.6 x 30.8 cm, Paper Size: 55.8 x 71.1 cm <br>CREDIT LINE: Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Hugh M. Taft<br>OBJECT NUMBER: 1996.065<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group alignfull\"><div class=\"wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-flow wp-block-group-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"tw-text-wide has-large-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">In <em>\u200b\u200b<\/em>his 1585 engraving <em>Mars and Venus Surprised by Vulcan, <\/em>Hendrick Goltzius uses exaggerated and unstable figures to develop drama and tension in his condemnatory scene of marital infidelity. Goltzius depicts Vulcan violently removing the sheets from a bed containing his wife, Venus, and her lover, Mars. Hovering over the bed, a group of other gods including Neptune, Mercury, Jupiter, and Apollo, charge into the bedroom to shame the adulterers. Contorted and convulsing, the gods above appear to be suspended mid-motion, their limbs and torsos twisted and curved into unnatural positions. The extended legs of Mercury, Jupiter, and Apollo point diagonally at the same leftward slant, which Goltzius highlights by placing the vertical edge of a doorway just behind Mercury\u2019s angled leg. In the bottom right, Vulcan appears similarly twisted, with exaggerated back and leg muscles that Goltzius emphasizes by darkening the shadows in the contours of the god\u2019s body. Overall, the writhing, unstable figures occupy most of the space of the print, encouraging the viewer to acknowledge the scene holistically without focusing upon individual characters or images.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"tw-text-wide has-large-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">This aim to develop the broad intensity of a scene is one of the defining characteristics of Goltzius\u2019 classical prints. His other works of classical mythology, including <em><a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nga.gov\/collection\/art-object-page.156170.html\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"https:\/\/www.nga.gov\/collection\/art-object-page.156170.html\" target=\"_blank\">Apollo and Coronis<\/a><\/em> (1585) and <em><a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nga.gov\/collection\/art-object-page.133872.html\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"https:\/\/www.nga.gov\/collection\/art-object-page.133872.html\" target=\"_blank\">Perseus and Andromeda<\/a> <\/em>(1583), show a similar deemphasis of specific characters to instead encapsulate his scenes in sweeping dramatic and climactic tones. Dutch contemporaries of Goltzius such as Joachim Wtewael (1566 &#8211; 1638) created classical works with far more focus on individual protagonists. Wtewael painted a similar scene, also titled <em><a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.getty.edu\/art\/collection\/objects\/715\/joachim-anthonisz-wtewael-mars-and-venus-surprised-by-vulcan-dutch-1604-1608\/\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"https:\/\/www.getty.edu\/art\/collection\/objects\/715\/joachim-anthonisz-wtewael-mars-and-venus-surprised-by-vulcan-dutch-1604-1608\/\" target=\"_blank\">Mars and Venus Surprised by Vulcan<\/a><\/em> (1604\u20131608), that accentuates the personal intimacy between Venus and Mars. In contrast to Goltzius\u2019s method of crowding the interloping gods around the couple, Wtewael separates the other figures from the lovers. As a result, Venus and Mars become the focus of Wtewael\u2019s painting, with less emphasis on the intensity of the broader scene. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"tw-text-wide has-large-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">The seriousness and drama of Goltzius\u2019 print conveys a tone of disapproval regarding the Venus and Mars\u2019 adultery. In contrast to the domineering and exaggeratedly active figures of Vulcan and the interloping gods, Venus and Mars are depicted in passive and weaker positions, indicating that the lovers have been defeated; Vulcan, the victim of the adultery, has won by exposing their deception. As Lee Hendrix argues, Goltzius\u2019 print \u201cworks to unmask and expose the deceitfulness underlying [the Olympians\u2019] physicality, by taking the form of a monumental depiction of one of the most infamous [examples] of marital infidelity.\u201d Thus, Goltzius\u2019 use of passive figures for Venus and Mars serves to condemn their scandalous acts of adultery, while the exaggerated and active figures that represent the remaining gods encourage the viewer to acknowledge the holistic intensity of the scene, underscoring the seriousness of the infidelity. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"tw-text-wide wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:20px\">Written by Tobias Ziemke, edited by Simone Edgar Holmes <\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:55px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"tw-text-wide wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:20px\"><strong>Bibliography<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"tw-text-wide wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:18px\">Hendrix, Lee. \u201cConquering Illusion: Bartholomeus Spranger\u2019s influence in Venus and Mars Surprised by Vulcan by Hendrik Goltzius.\u201d In <em>Hendrik Goltzius and the Classical Tradition<\/em>, 66-72. Los Angeles: Fisher Gallery of the University of Southern California, 1992. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"tw-text-wide wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:18px\">Lowenthal, Anne W. <em>Joachim Wtewael: Mars and Venus Surprised by Vulcan<\/em>. Malibu: The J. Paul Getty Museum, 1995.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ARTIST: Hendrick Goltzius (Dutch, 1558 \u2013 1617)DATE: 1585TECHNIQUE: EngravingDIMENSIONS: Image: 41.6 x 30.8 cm, Paper Size: 55.8 x 71.1 cm CREDIT LINE: Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Hugh M. TaftOBJECT NUMBER: 1996.065 In \u200b\u200bhis 1585 engraving Mars and Venus Surprised by Vulcan, Hendrick Goltzius uses exaggerated and unstable figures to develop drama and tension in&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-526","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/526","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=526"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/526\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":530,"href":"https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/526\/revisions\/530"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/museum.middcreate.net\/projects\/early-modern-dutch-prints\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=526"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}